|
Report Targets Sierra Leone Trade; Suggests Boycott - Feb.2000
A Canadian non-governmental organization has prepared a report on
"combat diamonds," which criticizes diamond companies who buy diamonds
from Sierra Leone.
The report by Partnership Africa Canada (PAC) says the diamond
industry has prolonged the long-running conflict, which has killed tens of
thousands of civilians.
The report accuses De Beers of not doing enough to determine the source of
gemstones. "There will never be a lasting peace in Sierra Leone until the
diamond industry as a whole is properly managed," says one of the report’s
co-authors. De Beers, however, notes it has no offices currently operating in
Western Africa.
The report also accuses Belgian diamond officials of ignoring signs that
diamonds smuggled from Liberia and other states had been smuggled out of Sierra
Leone. It noted that the Belgian industry reported Liberian exports into Belgium
of 31 million carats, while the country’s mining capacity is between 100,000
and 150,000 carats. The organization called for a high-level investigation of
the Belgian diamond industry.
In response, the Diamond High Council, the industry umbrella group, said in a
statement that "we have learned from our mistakes in the past … No other
product is controlled more carefully than diamonds entering Antwerp. The
illegitimate trade of diamonds must come to an end. But we need to strike at the
roots of the evil and not at Antwerp."
Unlike other NGOs publicizing the diamond-war link, the Partnership Africa
Canada has suggested a consumer boycott of diamonds might be necessary to stop
the link between diamonds and war in Sierra Leone.
U.S. Congressman Tony Hall of Ohio, who has introduced a bill mandating that
all diamonds be sold with a certificate of origin, has also introduced a bill
that would ban the import of diamonds from Sierra Leone. There are currently no
restrictions against companies buying diamonds from Sierra Leone, although some
of the major diamond organizations have spoken out against all "combat
diamonds."
Hall, meanwhile, says he is pressing ahead with his certificate of origin
legislation, although he says it is "not cast in stone." Still, he
called upon the diamond industry to come up with an enforceable way to regulate
"conflict diamond" sales. He recently met with the CSO, which told him
they take the question of "conflict diamonds" very seriously. British
group Global Witness has praised De Beers and the industry for its
"turnaround" on the "combat diamond" question, but says
there is a lot more work to be done, and says it will continue to tell consumers
there is a link between diamonds and African conflicts.
U.N. Official: Angolan Diamond Sanctions Work
There is some good news on the "Dirty Diamonds" front. Robert
Fowler, the head of the U.N. Sanctions Committee on Angola, said he had found
evidence that the U.N. embargo on diamond purchases had made some progress in
halting the country’s diamond-for-arms trade. Currently, U.N. sanctions forbid
the purchase of any diamond from Angola that is not accompanied by a government
certificate. De Beers recently halted the purchase of all Angolan gems.
Global Witness says that UNITA’s diamond earnings have been cut to about
$100 million a year. Fowler said if that were true, it would be a sign of the
sanctions’ success.
DRB’s View
At the Diamond Registry, we agree that these countries need help both with
their peace efforts — and the diamond industry cannot play a role in these
wars. In the long run, however, the problem is not just the wars, but finding
out how a country’s diamond riches can benefit all the people.v |