In a joint announcement by the American Gemological Laboratories
(AGL) and the Gemstone Standards Commission (GSC), C.R. Beesley, President
of AGL and Director of Research for the Commission said, "We are well aware of the
technology used in this process. Despite the representations made by Pegasus, it is clear
that this enhancement procedure will fall under the FTC guidelines. Therefore, disclosure
is essential, not optional."
Eli Haas at the Diamond Dealers Club of New York (DDC)
meeting said, "Everybody is up in arms about the LKI situation, I believe that De
Beers is spending 24 hours a day trying to find a way to recognize [the process]." At
a meeting with the Federal Trade Commission, Haas stated the opinion of the DDCNY
"The agreement we have now with GIA, LKI and GE only gives us breathing space."
The DDCNY wants the FTC to issue a special ruling to add the GE process to a list of
diamond treatments that must be disclosed, thereby making it illegal to sell a GE
processed diamond without full disclosure. When asked whats so bad about the GE
process situation, Haas responded, "What if people could make $100 bills that look
and act just like the real thing and nobody would be able to tell the difference until a
year or 5 years from now?"
AGL also offered a defense of the GIAs failure to identify the
new enhancement. Beesley said, "The methodology used by Pegasus to establish the
non-detectability of this enhancement is invalid. No one had an opportunity to develop a
platform for analysis and neither GIA nor any other lab had good reason to test for a new
enhancement procedure." Beesley further stated that detection is not only possible
but probable in a relatively short time.
When asked whether the industry might see some cooperation amongst the
various laboratories in this identification process, R. Esmerian, Chairman of GSC,
answered, "I wish labs would coordinate on even simple issues. None of the labs
really work together and its a disaster for the trade." Without mentioning
specific jewelers or manufacturers, Esmerian continued, " The labs are meant to be
removed from the merchandizing of gems. Unfortunately there is a lack of knowledge and a
lack of disclosure which plays into the merchants hands and some of the merchants are
happy to have that continue."
Esmerian, who works with Gemcore, a not-for-profit laboratory
for colored stones and colored diamonds which has been operating for 8 years, was quite
clear in his assessment of the overall situation, "Were doing it totally to
ourselves and our industry. This latest development from Pegasus and GE is just the latest
indication that its not some asteroid thats being hurled at us from outer
space, but rather that were doing it ourselves within our own family."
Esmerian stated that he and Gemcore have been working with Beesley on the issue and the
two hope to bring the situation to a rapid and definitive close. Esmerian added, "We
are confident that our efforts will be successful in reducing the level of anxiety
surrounding these pressing enhancement issues. Through a coordinated research effort we
plan to insure that confidence in both diamonds and colored stones will be effectively
reinforced."