“Conflict Diamond” Issue Makes News at Congress - Nov.2004
The conflict diamond issue again was raised at the World Congress, again by
non-governmental groups.
Amnesty International and Global Witness presented a survey that said that
many US retailers did not respond to letters asking them for information about
their polices on conflict diamonds, and some of the responses did not provide
adequate details on what the stores’ policies were to avoid conflict diamonds.
It also said that the salespeople at many stores were unaware of conflict
diamonds and did not provide adequate responses to their questions.
The groups “criticized the industry’s efforts as little more than public
relations” and said it was “falling far short of adequately monitoring
self-regulation,” the Financial Times said.
The industry responds: In response, the IDMA and WFDB reiterated their
commitment to end any use of rough diamonds for the purpose of funding conflict
in Africa.
“Diamonds make an enormous contribution to the economic development and
prosperity of the nations that produce, cut, manufacture and design diamonds and
diamond jewelry,” a joint resolution said. “We will continue to remain
vigilant so that rough diamonds are never again used to fuel war.”
The groups urged that members seek for their suppliers on guarantees on their
invoices that the accompanying diamonds do not fund conflict, and to educate
themselves about the Kimberley Process and the supporting system of warranties.
The trade’s opinion: While many in the trade have long been supportive
of the NGO’s goals of stopping conflict diamonds, they find it very hard to
work up any support for this latest campaign. The industry has accomplished a
good deal with the Kimberley Process. Should that not matter if it’s found
that a salesperson doesn’t know what a conflict diamond is? And even if every
store gave them a thorough answer, this wouldn’t make a difference for
Kimberley, which is a tightly designed and monitored scheme meant to track the
flow of rough. It is harder—if not impossible — to track polished,
and that is not necessary anyway if all the rough coming out of the ground has
been certified as clean.
Unfortunately, a great portion of retailers’ inventories dates back to
before there was a conflict diamond issue, thereby making certification of all
stones in those inventories an impossibility.v
|